Monday 19 March 2012

Willles thinks Canucks lack of effort a sign of arrogance


It was interesting to measure Daniel Sedin's response after the Canucks' 4-3 win over Columbus on Saturday night. Sedin scored two goals, his first markers in 10 games, while the Canucks ended a three-game losing streak on home ice. This should have qualified as happy news.
Right?
But Daniel was not happy.
"I didn't think we played that good tonight but we were able to squeeze a win out," said Daniel, with a distinct trace of anger in his voice. "We can't give up over 30 shots. That's unacceptable."
And that should qualify him for a truth in advertising award.  More…
Danny knows they need to play better,
they just aren't.
Shacks’ Take:  One could argue the Canucks haven’t won anything and the amount they are paid should be motivation enough.  Since Ed likely hasn’t played in a two-month playoff I’ll assume he has no idea what the Canucks are feeling or what their motivation would be. 
Vancouver needs to make the playoffs with a favorable seeding for the playoffs. That’s it, and they accomplished that about two months ago.   Asking a team that knows it has nothing to play for to play harder than desperate opponents is a noble concept but unlikely to happen.  
If in fact the Canucks are unable to turn it up a notch once the playoffs start and get eliminated early, it will be another lesson in the growth of this team and you’ll likely see a more concerted effort next year.  The Canucks should be more worried about ensuring their defense is tightened than effort level at this point.  How thrilled would anyone be to throw their body around and risk injury when it will have no effect on their ultimate goal? 
Is it arrogance or boredom?  I’ll let you decide but you know my answer. 

No comments:

Post a Comment